Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Zersterer <nochsfentor@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,de.talk.bizarre
Subject: Re: PING: Ivo
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 00:26:47 -0500
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <lf400qFe7vqU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <v61csn$1p9b6$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v61glr$1rkpd$1@paganini.bofh.team> <v61hag$1o47o$6@dont-email.me>
 <v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me> <v6cv8i$6uo$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me> <668c904a$0$983$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net vBVXToVkuSljHn9n6xwJhQas0cI7bFRgFyPo5Yj7UJjVIzIK32
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RPMoeKgbsW2S1DpEUvOWzPWZe04= sha256:Nm3sZFysG9ucbLLDQJXrVDaFpexAcTXmQY0RssCTb0c=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
In-Reply-To: <668c904a$0$983$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Bytes: 3512

Skeeter wrote:
> In article <v6i126$1350r$1@dont-email.me>, nad318b404@gmail.invalid
> says...
>>
>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes, melt!
>> On Sun, 07 Jul 2024 02:41:23 +0000, Noel Barret wrote:
>>
>>> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> wrote in
>>> news:v67rdn$34ld6$1@dont-email.me:
>>>
>>>> Time to trigger the right-wing snowflakes again. Melt, snowflakes,
>>>> melt! On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:36:01 +0000, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ivo Gandolfo <usenet@bofh.team> wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/07/2024 19:20, kensi wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there a valid reason for requiring connecting to paganini
>>>>>>> *twice*? The first connection always gets "reset" and one must
>>>>>>> repeat the action to get it to successfully connect. Is this
>>>>>>> silliness meant to discourage drive-by spammers or something by
>>>>>>> making it look like the server is down?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> In any event, could you please cut it out and just accept a user's
>>>>>>> first connection? It's annoying your legitimate users and I doubt it
>>>>>>> prevents much spam.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I have never implemented a system like this. It could be network
>>>>>> problems. Write me your IP privately via email and I will try to
>>>>>> investigate why, as you are the first to complain about something
>>>>>> like this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please just go with it. seamus imbues this sockpuppet with all of his
>>>>> paranoic tendancies.
>>>>
>>>> ... says the kook who thinks that kensi is someone named Seamus. There
>>>> is an old adage involving stones and glass houses that might, just
>>>> might, be apropos here.
>>>>
>>>>> There is only one correct response:
>>>>
>>>> And that would be "everyone snickers at the latest pathetic attempt by
>>>> Verman to derail an otherwise productive and on-topic thread".
>>>
>>> No thread you're ever in is productive.
>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>>
>>>> FU set appropriately.
>>>
>>> yep.
>>
>> Your froth only makes me stronger, kook.
>>
>> <snicker>
> 
> So you admit you need usenet to survive. Where is the whore Kensi?

This skeeter is a sockpuppet of the character % from alt.suicide.holiday
It is arguably his best sock, but he's losing it  I find him threatening 
because he is to me what I was to you that made you resign from the
CIA to take up a new life on facebook.

I'd like to see you live without it.

Where is the whore kensi?  would fit right in a Brian Herbert novel.