Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:52:34 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <v73gk2$obtd$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
 <97e0632d0d889d141bdc6005ce6e513c53867798@i2pn2.org>
 <v6sdlu$382g0$1@dont-email.me> <v6td3a$3ge79$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6tp1j$3imib$2@dont-email.me> <v6trdu$3irhh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6tu01$3imib$11@dont-email.me>
 <a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
 <v6tvpv$3imib$14@dont-email.me>
 <091e8b7baeea467ee894b1c79c8943cb9773adb7@i2pn2.org>
 <v6u346$3khl8$1@dont-email.me>
 <16ac79611a441e7e01119631051f69119eee958a@i2pn2.org>
 <v6v06i$3pivt$1@dont-email.me>
 <23cb2d2401b87bf4f6a604aa1a78b93ffc9a29bc@i2pn2.org>
 <v6v2t1$3pmjn$3@dont-email.me>
 <3fc6548531f91ed14a27420caf9679a634573ed0@i2pn2.org>
 <v70lmo$61d8$1@dont-email.me>
 <8a6e6d9ff49aabe2525ce5729a439c807de4768a@i2pn2.org>
 <34Ocnd4voeWlDAn7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v725d7$hlvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa7643b6d8c46d2c4dd5ef92ae3650afe114adbb@i2pn2.org>
 <v734ct$mjis$2@dont-email.me>
 <056325e336f81a50f4fb9e60f90934eaac823d22@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:52:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13997779445f04dacae82f025877e637";
	logging-data="798637"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181DI6lw7VBarLMare6L8KP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wY6QiVDDFJ3QrSyZLhJXeo3VIg8=
In-Reply-To: <056325e336f81a50f4fb9e60f90934eaac823d22@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3147

On 7/15/2024 9:04 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 07:23:57 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 7/15/2024 3:59 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 22:35:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 7/14/2024 10:02 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
> 
>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
>>>> simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
>>>> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>> It's just that the input HHH halts and does not need to be aborted.
>> At the point that it is aborted it did need to be aborted
> Because it hadn't halted yet? 

Because HHH has seen a repeating state that proves that DDD
correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly ever stop running
unless aborted.

That you fail to understand a that there is a repeating state
or fail to understand that a repeating state proves this is
less than no rebuttal at all.

> Why should it have halted, it will do so
> in the future. Do you place arbitrary lifetime limits on all programs?
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer