Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: How Einstein's worshippers fabricated evidence against basic math
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2024 16:22:17 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v8vvup$2nkf1$22@dont-email.me>
References: <17e9771fbd1f39ad$206590$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v8vuu5$2nkf1$20@dont-email.me>
 <17e97814924873db$207030$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2024 16:22:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ee868451ad7ede8480e4387e31bc418";
	logging-data="2871777"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2hDB9gPkoltjaBdt7LYL3"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ItYsx3c+clD8IU9964yjij395dM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17e97814924873db$207030$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2361

Le 07/08/2024 à 16:19, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 07.08.2024 o 16:04, Python pisze:
>> Le 07/08/2024 à 16:01, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> https://www.gutenberg.org/files/37157/37157-pdf.pdf
>>>
>>> 1908 - nothing about so trendy nowadays
>>> "counterexamples" against Euclidean
>>> prejudices allegedly found in massive numbers
>>> on Earth surface.
>>
>> non sequitur.
> 
> What "non sequitur", poor stinker?
> Did  P mention such counterexamples
> or not?
> 
> 
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poincar%C3%A9_disk_model
> 
> out of topic.
>>
>>> [???] have invented them after [???] announced EG false...
>>
>> Nobody "announced Euclidean Geometry false". You don't
> 
> So, is Vth axiom and Pythagorean theorem
> true  according to your idiotic religion?
> True for real, poor stinker?
> Even the lower ranks of your moronic church
> didn't buy this absurd lie, and openly declare
> EG as some delusion of an old Greek. Sorry,
> trash.

It is pointless to discuss (again!) these points with someone
with is not educated in the field and has no intellectual
integrity such as you. It is marginally funny for a while but
not for long.