Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities --- Fake rebuttals trying to get away with mere rhetoric Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:49:02 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 47 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="02bedc76074b37eacb17f68ffc18830d"; logging-data="2354568"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19N5AfjydmgO/dScvr9pCUn" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:/ODrzNvF+8T39/jY04PYnohrgZI= Bytes: 2683 On 2024-07-23 14:34:36 +0000, olcott said: > On 7/23/2024 2:26 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-07-22 16:10:55 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 7/20/2024 3:03 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >>>> [ Followup-To: set ] >>>> >>>> In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> >>>> [ .... ] >>>> >>>>> Olcott could not point to an error, but prefers to ignore it. So, I will >>>>> repeat it, until either an error is found, or olcott admits that HHH >>>>> cannot possibly simulate itself correctly. >>>> >>>> This has the disadvantage of making your posts boring to read.  All but >>>> one poster on this newsgroup KNOW that Olcott is wrong, here. >>>> >>>> Continually repeating your argument won't get him to admit he's wrong. >>>> Richard has been trying that for much longer than you have, with the >>>> same lack of success.  Olcott's lack of capacity for abstract reasoning, >>>> combined with his ignorance, combined with his arrogance, prevent him >>>> learning at all. >>>> >>>> May I suggest that you reconsider your strategy of endless repetition? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>> >>> >>> Rebuttals like yours are entirely baseless by failing to point out any >>> mistake. >> >> What makes you think taht Alan Mackenzie was trying to rebut what >> Fred. Zwarts had said? >> > > In other words you don't see the ad hominem attacks against > me that are listed above? You are lying again. That is not the same in other words. I saw no rebuttals of ad hominem attacs against you. -- Mikko