Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 11:19:40 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v8kp6s$3c5h2$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2024 10:19:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1a0dbf49226a9afe8ac0f2cff9b34f2";
	logging-data="3544610"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18LpglhF2Va97m94qu9p14z"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tgwukn4qyi6t3boV374HF3jFrUI=
Bytes: 1331

On 2024-08-02 20:57:26 +0000, olcott said:

> Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated
> by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction?
> 
> void DDD()
> {
>    HHH(DDD);
>    return;
> }

Everyone here understands that that depends on whther HHH returns.

-- 
Mikko