Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH maps its input to the behavior specified by it ---
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 14:15:40 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <v98e8s$sddi$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v8jh7m$30k55$1@dont-email.me> <v8v7p3$29r2r$1@dont-email.me>
 <v8vub1$32fso$14@dont-email.me>
 <1e1fa9bc4bbc00aa65c1a7974bd1bda87687c92b@i2pn2.org>
 <v90di8$38oni$1@dont-email.me>
 <47a76378d634bf0db4017f879d0160793b57125e@i2pn2.org>
 <v9161o$3gaju$1@dont-email.me>
 <b84374e766c199e1ba38ef1dc3bc8f6ab2c39dfc@i2pn2.org>
 <v91i97$3n4m0$1@dont-email.me> <v91unh$3rbor$1@dont-email.me>
 <v92gja$p1$3@dont-email.me> <v94m0l$ljf4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v95ae9$p5rb$1@dont-email.me> <v978dv$h1ib$1@dont-email.me>
 <v97j0q$ilah$2@dont-email.me>
 <ccc5dafb53acf66239baac0183a6291687794963@i2pn2.org>
 <v97l3j$kof0$2@dont-email.me> <v97pgq$l4f4$2@dont-email.me>
 <v97qf0$lise$2@dont-email.me> <v97rq3$l4f4$4@dont-email.me>
 <v97t7g$m8l6$1@dont-email.me>
 <332fdac834dd53dbe6a8650e170f08fac33ca2cf@i2pn2.org>
 <v988fu$r9k6$1@dont-email.me>
 <614b136972063ab2c9d5e3d91e4289858ef24f55@i2pn2.org>
 <v98ag9$rj63$1@dont-email.me>
 <9721b1bcc4a6849dabc5d7956754292823381840@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 21:15:41 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec0d1ee71ceed677a7540299f25b1a73";
	logging-data="931250"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ABEhgLdV7K5pVmi6bvrcJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+NW8UsxMePkvwO3f4w8kKMK8H8Q=
In-Reply-To: <9721b1bcc4a6849dabc5d7956754292823381840@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3384

On 8/10/2024 1:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 8/10/24 2:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 8/10/2024 12:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 8/10/24 1:37 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> void DDD()
>>>> {
>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>    return;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> *The set of HHH x86 emulators are defined such that*
>>>> Each element of this set corresponds to one element of the set
>>>> of positive integers indicating the number of  x86 instructions
>>>> of DDD that it emulates.
>>>

*This is the mistake that I corrected*
>>> But every one that emulates for a finite number of steps, and then 
>>> returns create a halting DDD, so you claim is just disproven.

<snip>
>>
>> When each element of the outer-most directly executed SHH
>> corresponds to one element of the set of positive integers
>> indicating the number of x86 instructions of DDD that it
>> emulates none of the emulated instances of HHH ever returns.
> 
> And EVERY ONE Of them doesn't get the right answer.
> 

*Yes it does seem to be your ADD*
We are not even talking about the right answer.

We are talking about your mistake that at least one
element of the emulated HHH returns.
*None of them ever returns no-matter-what*

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer