Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Who here is too stupid to know that DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own return instruction? Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 08:11:56 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 15:11:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="903796c801119a1f2fd86200a8e93bf1"; logging-data="56329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+nWJcH6+cMZs9JTDdu0jIs" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:iSpswee4/9MHcNN/F2PTHn8PgzE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2154 On 8/4/2024 1:26 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: > Op 03.aug.2024 om 17:20 schreef olcott:>> >> When you try to show how DDD simulated by HHH does >> reach its "return" instruction you must necessarily >> must fail unless you cheat by disagreeing with the >> semantics of C. That you fail to have a sufficient >> understanding of the semantics of C is less than no >> rebuttal what-so-ever. > > Fortunately that is not what I try, because I understand that HHH cannot > possibly simulate itself correctly. > void DDD() { HHH(DDD); return; } In other words when HHH simulates itself simulating DDD it is supposed to do something other than simulating itself simulating DDD ??? Do you expect it to make a cup of coffee? -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer