Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: True on the basis of meaning (and not any other kind) Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 11:01:05 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 10:01:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a5c6a761e1a568dd548fea8baecc84eb"; logging-data="549578"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fGq3mL6OeZGR+ADCRmui4" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:RvyQ0viAjnK/LXQPCd5BJkRF6SY= Bytes: 2007 On 2024-08-09 15:19:47 +0000, olcott said: > On 8/9/2024 3:46 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-08-08 16:01:19 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> >>> It does seem that he is all hung up on not understanding >>> how the synonymity of bachelor and unmarried works. >> >> What in the synonymity, other than the synonymity itself, >> would be relevant to Quine's topic? >> > > He mentions it 98 times in his paper > https://www.ditext.com/quine/quine.html > I haven't looked at it in years. So you don't know but want to lie about it. -- Mikko