Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: magardner2010 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: SystemD controversy Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 16:34:14 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 14:34:14 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c3cca4dc50836720a4b8095f8cac86bc"; logging-data="1054951"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qp3nsoImIiwqGxngfQ3YklnoaRlgsxOI=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:20dtI5tZcTVGg7TjOpPGuDzHzTw= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB, hu-HU Bytes: 1799 On 13/03/2024 16:07, Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester wrote: > Hello. > > Ada-compiler makers used to target Red Hat and different Adaists used to > contribute to Debian. > > Red Hat and Debian use disputed SystemD C code. Do you avoid it? > > Regards. > Nioclás Caileán Pól de Ghloucester I'm pretty sure that the presence or absence of SystemD doesn't, or at least shouldn't, influence how compilers work. So, unless one is writing software that directly interacts with the init system, or any of the other components that SystemD provides (and are not yet available in other init systems), it shouldn't matter if one is programming on/for Debian, Devuan, Arch, Fedora, Red Hat, or possibly even one of the BSDs.