Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael S Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: COBOL, Article on new mainframe use Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 11:20:29 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <20240823112029.00002202@yahoo.com> References: <61a50eac95ff8fa39af47f03daa885d0@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 10:20:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="390be1a8b7b8306fa0a09c1cb3e4318f"; logging-data="902674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YiRYEwWb3y0rKCOccX+CG6KeYilvT7eg=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:3ML9qBOKu9VSoQGZis1vd4ZAKlw= X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.34; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Bytes: 2050 On Fri, 23 Aug 2024 09:40:00 +0200 Terje Mathisen wrote: > MitchAlsup1 wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 18:21:00 +0000, John Dallman wrote: > > =20 > >> =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 I had a basic COBOL course at = college in 1980-81, and > >> became quite clear that this wasn't what I wanted to do. > >> > >> John =20 > >=20 > > So, John is not a COBOholic !! =20 >=20 > Also not a COBOL fan, mostly due to the verbosity. >=20 > I once ported a COBOL-specific algorithm to Pascal, which meant that > I had to reimplement code for all the 80-col punch card formatted IO > as well as sorting according to quite special rules. >=20 > The original was 25 pages, my replacement ~5, at least half of which > was the COBOL specific function replacements, so the mainline code > became an order of magnitude smaller. >=20 > Terje >=20 What would be the size if you were porting it from COBOL to COBOL ?