Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Fixing a sample from K&R book using cake static analyser
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:26:20 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID: <v5or0s$2r9ra$1@news.xmission.com>
References: <v53sl1$35qt7$1@dont-email.me> <v5i1tf$2bb5g$1@dont-email.me> <v5nefh$3hout$2@dont-email.me> <v5nk05$3ivra$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 11:26:20 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4";
	logging-data="2991978"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Bytes: 1666
Lines: 20

In article <v5nk05$3ivra$1@dont-email.me>,
....


I don't understand how Fixing a sample from K&R book using cake static analyser
can be off topic in this newsgroup.  Sounds about as on-topic as anything
else posted here recently.

So, I don't get why the Subject line is what it is.

Now, of course, if the Subject line had been changed to:

    Subject: O/T: Ramblings about alcoholic beverages

then I'd completely understand.

-- 
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long.  As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs.  In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
	http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/ModernXtian