Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb>
Newsgroups: alt.usage.english,sci.lang
Subject: Re: If [Trumpery] means (see below), What does [Kamalary] mean?
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 22:24:00 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vabqpg$19euh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vab965$13hfb$2@dont-email.me> <vabp2o$195k4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:24:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a8bd04c3b2f51b88e59216ddd9935e8d";
	logging-data="1358801"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX190ZgXx0MhQw84nyIayHCffgUOR2kgXWaI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JFN1Pd4v3xGcvJLq5ICGnpQNbrI=
In-Reply-To: <vabp2o$195k4$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2938


On 8/23/2024 9:54 PM, Hibou wrote:
> Le 24/08/2024 à 01:23, HenHanna a écrit :
>>
>> If   [Trumpery]  means (see below),  What does  [Kamalary]  mean?
>>
>>
>>       \TRUMP-uh-ree\ • noun.
>>                   1 : worthless nonsense
>>                   2 : trivial or useless articles : junk.
>>
>> 1. something without use or value; rubbish; trash; worthless stuff ·
>> 2. nonsense; twaddle.



> 
> Ah yes, the old 'trumpery' joke.
> 
> As an outsider, there are things I don't understand. For instance: Trump 
> said he wanted to make America great again (it may have been 'grate'; 
> I've heard it but not seen it written). Harris now says that America is 
> the greatest nation on Earth. Is she saying that Trump succeeded?


Yes...  The Liberal-Acrobatic-Superhearing...

When Trump says  [MAGA]  (Make America Great Again)
               -- omg... the Horrors!   What a vulgar, LOW thing to say!

But when a Democrat says almost the same thing.... .....



> 
> (Pots and kettles? Scotland did for a while describe itself as "the best 
> small country in the world". No-one ever did explain how those 
> responsible had arrived at that conclusion.
> 
> <https://electriccanadian.com/canada/pics/scotb1.jpg>)
> 
> I do wonder at the amount of time the BBC devotes to American elections. 
> Given that US elections drag on and on, for months and months - or is it 
> years? - and that there is some coverage every day, I suspect it adds up 
> to far more than our national broadcaster gives to British elections. If 
> so, is this right and proportionate? It's certainly tiresome.
> 
> FU2 aue alone.
> 


You post to 2 NG's  and then  force  a response to only ONE
                               ---------  how can it make ANY sense?