Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Hibou
Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: If [Trumpery] means (see below), What does [Kamalary] mean?
Followup-To: alt.usage.english
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 05:54:48 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 06:54:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a6f7d5b3529530ac20bce813b9264d63";
logging-data="1349252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19j00IYaR3Q6CyDhGQkgzXd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:v8HCU0Iw8lZTI2toT0/PqWiGhjY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To:
Bytes: 2424
Le 24/08/2024 à 01:23, HenHanna a écrit :
>
> If [Trumpery] means (see below), What does [Kamalary] mean?
>
>
> \TRUMP-uh-ree\ • noun.
> 1 : worthless nonsense
> 2 : trivial or useless articles : junk.
>
> 1. something without use or value; rubbish; trash; worthless stuff ·
> 2. nonsense; twaddle.
Ah yes, the old 'trumpery' joke.
As an outsider, there are things I don't understand. For instance: Trump
said he wanted to make America great again (it may have been 'grate';
I've heard it but not seen it written). Harris now says that America is
the greatest nation on Earth. Is she saying that Trump succeeded?
(Pots and kettles? Scotland did for a while describe itself as "the best
small country in the world". No-one ever did explain how those
responsible had arrived at that conclusion.
)
I do wonder at the amount of time the BBC devotes to American elections.
Given that US elections drag on and on, for months and months - or is it
years? - and that there is some coverage every day, I suspect it adds up
to far more than our national broadcaster gives to British elections. If
so, is this right and proportionate? It's certainly tiresome.
FU2 aue alone.