Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Hibou Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english Subject: Re: If [Trumpery] means (see below), What does [Kamalary] mean? Followup-To: alt.usage.english Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 05:54:48 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 33 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 06:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a6f7d5b3529530ac20bce813b9264d63"; logging-data="1349252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19j00IYaR3Q6CyDhGQkgzXd" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:v8HCU0Iw8lZTI2toT0/PqWiGhjY= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2424 Le 24/08/2024 à 01:23, HenHanna a écrit : > > If   [Trumpery]  means (see below),  What does  [Kamalary]  mean? > > >      \TRUMP-uh-ree\ • noun. >                  1 : worthless nonsense >                  2 : trivial or useless articles : junk. > > 1. something without use or value; rubbish; trash; worthless stuff · > 2. nonsense; twaddle. Ah yes, the old 'trumpery' joke. As an outsider, there are things I don't understand. For instance: Trump said he wanted to make America great again (it may have been 'grate'; I've heard it but not seen it written). Harris now says that America is the greatest nation on Earth. Is she saying that Trump succeeded? (Pots and kettles? Scotland did for a while describe itself as "the best small country in the world". No-one ever did explain how those responsible had arrived at that conclusion. ) I do wonder at the amount of time the BBC devotes to American elections. Given that US elections drag on and on, for months and months - or is it years? - and that there is some coverage every day, I suspect it adds up to far more than our national broadcaster gives to British elections. If so, is this right and proportionate? It's certainly tiresome. FU2 aue alone.