Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Sync two clocks
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 08:43:36 +0200
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <liis7uFlcbgU5@mid.individual.net>
References: <u18wy1Hl3tOo1DpOF6WVSF0s-08@jntp> <v9nant$1d2us$1@dont-email.me>
 <vPP1Z1BJfE1Dt7SYhCzEo7ZQWFI@jntp> <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net JAzWQNaaYiY3N1ly6A/ckg1+kLkfwDcT/8SXGZUl6Ez8WKuWBj
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8nzshHPJ7vnKBE5G15gbGSRoq6k= sha256:Nz9hdKmx9OX6OVB9wZ+rv8j9IJ1AXTOmmeyyUBf4tBY=
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <va0a4f$30p95$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2568

Am Montag000019, 19.08.2024 um 22:33 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
> Den 16.08.2024 14:24, skrev Richard Hachel:
>> Le 16/08/2024 à 12:47, Python a écrit :
>>> If the meaning of t_A, t_B, and t'_A are still unknown to you, you can
>>> refer to Einstein 1905 article.
>>>
>>> t_A is the time shown by clock A when a light signal is emitted;
>>>
>>> t_B is the time shown by clock B when the signal is received and 
>>> re-emitted;
>>>
>>> t'_A is the time shown by clock A when the returned signal is received.
> 
> 
> Below I show how two real clocks in the real world can be
> synchronised, strictly according to Einstein's method.
> 
> We have to equal clocks C_A and C_B. They are not synced in any way,
> but they are using the same time unit, let's call it second.
> The clocks run at the same rate.


This is a self-contradicting statement!

'Synchronization' does not mean 'to turn the clocks to the same shown 
time once'.

Instead 'Synchronization' means 'adjust both clocks, that they are 
maintaining to show the same time'.

One part of the procedure would be to adjust the readings.

But the other part would be to adjust the tick-rate, hence the length of 
the second.

We could simply discard 'adjust the reading' from our todo list, at 
least for while, because upon our home-planet we have also time-zones.

That would leave 'adjustment of the tick-rate' as main requirement for 
synchronization.

But you have already preassumed, that this adjustment was already made. 
(with " The clocks run at the same rate.")

This would violate your statement, that both clocks are not synchronized.

....


TH