Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us11.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=`ECXc5:BGQM=LX4bSbU0nMHWonT5<]0TMdjI?Uho:XeKlL51CP6LDLL95GMl]75=8AHmmfl3JE?fO7@ Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Is Windows-on-ARM On Its Last Legs? Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 21:32:01 -0400 Message-ID: <87gp7jd3v634rb4rj8k3mkgit50t0n9u7j@4ax.com> References: <89ap7jd58cul732kscvb28kofcl46k1hj7@4ax.com> <67bp7jpbbnqf4aqnk60hvkl6uon1gmcug0@4ax.com> <1cfp7jpvlt7cclcg7a19dogbji0dsgc3ss@4ax.com> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OS: Linux Mint 21.3 Cinnamon, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI Lines: 40 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1719451921 reader.netnews.com 2363134 127.0.0.1:37187 Bytes: 2390 Joel wrote: >>>>>>> Why would you expect Intel/AMD CPUs to last much longer? >>>>>> >>>>>>Certainly the Windows market is unable to move away from them. >>>>> >>>>> Why? They have Winblows on ARM, apps can be compiled for it or >>>>> emulated. >>>> >>>>But Microsoft cannot offer a compelling value proposition for moving to >>>>such machines. >>> >>> Sure they can, it's efficient ... >> >>Only when running ARM-native code. Otherwise the x86 emulator drags >>performance down. And that still applies to the vast majority of Windows >>apps. > >Read the entire post I wrote, dummy. Actually, it wasn't even due to your unnecessary snipping, it's earlier in the quoting you left in, "can be compiled for it". Either way, comprehend first. -- Joel W. Crump Amendment XIV Section 1. [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.