Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Kestrel Clayton <richZIG.e.clayZIGton@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Largest animal genome 91 billion base-pairs.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:41:01 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 56
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <va8b9c$ipcq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <va5gh2$vb$1@dont-email.me>
 <w8Wdnb3hKoRPOFv7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="85266"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:988i5RynFRNc3Z2x6MF07IbbbW8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <w8Wdnb3hKoRPOFv7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
	FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5582

On 21-Aug-24 22:43, John Harshman wrote:
> On 8/21/24 12:51 PM, RonO wrote:
>> https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07830-1
>>
>> paywalled, but Science news article:
>>
>> https://www.science.org/content/article/odd-fish-has-30-times-much- 
>> dna-humans-new-record-animals
>>
>> They have just identified the new largest animal genome, but unlike 
>> amphibians that duplicated their whole genomes over and over to create 
>> their large genomes this lobe-finned fish (a species of lungfish) 
>> enlarged it's genome by failing to regulate the multiplication of 
>> transposons.  It has a 91 billion  base-pair genome, but still only as 
>> many genes as related lobe-finned fish (lobe-finned fish gave rise to 
>> tetrapods).  It has roughly the same number of genes that humans have, 
>> but it's genome is 30 times larger.  Allowing transposons to run 
>> rampant has increased it's genome size with copies of transposons by 
>> about 3 billion base-pairs every 10 million years.
>>
>> Transposons are parasitic bits of DNA that can replicate and move from 
>> place to place in the genome.  Because of their parasitic nature they 
>> have been lumped into junk DNA, but they often do have functional 
>> genes, and take their own transcription regulatory sequences with them 
>> when the hop around the genome, so they have some function, but it 
>> isn't geared to helping out the host.  They just use the host cells to 
>> keep replicating more copies of themselves.  Jumping into genes causes 
>> genetic diseases and jumping around genes can cause differential 
>> regulation of the surrounding genes, so they cause insertion mutations 
>> that do affect the organism, but like other mutations, most of the 
>> mutations are benign, some of them are bad, and a few of them may do 
>> some interesting things.  At this time for this lungfish probably 
>> nearly all new transposition events are likely messing up existing 
>> transposon sequence.  About 90% of the genome seems to be transposon 
>> sequence at this time, but my guess is that most of the remaining 90% 
>> is just old transposon sequence that has been mutated to the extent 
>> that they can't recognize the fragments as once being transposons.
>>
>> Ron Okimoto
>>
> That's Lepidosiren paradoxa. It's been known for a long time that it has 
> a huge genome, and that the other lungfish also have huge genomes. In 
> fact, it appears that Protopterus aethyopicus has an even bigger one. So 
> no huge surprise here, just greater detail on *why* it has a huge genome.
> 
> Check out the animal genome size database: http://www.genomesize.com/ 
> results.php?page=1

This is an interesting resource. Thank you very much!

-- 
[The address listed is a spam trap. To reply, take off every zig.]
Kestrel Clayton
I used to have a Kipling quote here,
but I'm not so fond of him any more.