Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tim Rentsch Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Fixing a sample from K&R book using cake static analyser Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 02:12:12 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 31 Message-ID: <868qymdcb7.fsf@linuxsc.com> References: <20240623034624.135@kylheku.com> <87wmmfq4if.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240624012527.8bbe16b96f5bfca10feadb5c@gmail.moc> <87zfrbnsvv.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87ikxyobls.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240624180824.534@kylheku.com> <87v81xmasc.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <20240625221205.84@kylheku.com> <20240626035330.813@kylheku.com> <87ed8h5ox4.fsf@fatphil.org> <20240628171138.00001ed6@yahoo.com> <86pls1c55j.fsf@linuxsc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 11:12:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8122076af5546f7640a872624b0271f"; logging-data="470565"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19l/SHjtXcOpbWhNd6RTh5sFOIHFCnkAWc=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:goSfRoX/TksCx4bQ4ejFnbuE+KI= sha1:JcrEUbnwPWZYRRBuqoQb906V48M= Bytes: 2920 Janis Papanagnou writes: > On 28.06.2024 20:07, Tim Rentsch wrote: > >> It would be nice if the discussion of different beers could be >> taken to a newsgroup where it is more topical, as for example >> to comp.lang.c++, where some amount of alcohol seems to be >> necessary to be able to endure the language. > > Serious(!) suggestions are (would be) always welcome. (At least > I spot some humor here, which is a Good Thing. :-) My request that the discussion of different beers be taken to a different newsgroup was a serious suggestion, even if the part about comp.lang.c++ was not. > (Otherwise, just a suggestion, try to ignore [OT] marked posts.) Your suggestion has approximately the same content as one to try to ignore assholes. In other words it's roughly equivalent to saying Fuck you. > More on-topic; I'm curious what problems a C professional has > with C++. Such a discussion is better carried out in comp.lang.c++ than here, both because it is more related to C++ than it is to C, and also because there is a greater level of expertise in C++ there than in comp.lang.c. I expect that essentially all C++ developers have a pretty good working knowledge of C, whereas many C developers do not have a good working knowledge of C++.