Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.in-chemnitz.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Fuld Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Address bits again, Article on new mainframe use Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:35:20 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: <2377cad7ee947ad71c9c3a8afbcdc26e@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 18:35:21 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f2fa24f005bb1cc6f28a6c7fbf637e17"; logging-data="1145492"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cW09kOwuE64TNtRK80VC2FVvDfKlfyW0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:mdaeFD44bd5VPprgoI3BjPw9kVU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 1898 On 9/2/2024 3:11 AM, John Levine wrote: snip > Also don't forget that back in that era everyone who had disks used > overlays. Not everyone. While you could do overlays on the 1108 and successors, it was infrequent. But using multiple banks was easy and convenient. An nice advantage of banking is that you could put shared libraries in their own banks, so you didn't have to worry about figuring out how to address them from the main program (as well as reducing the size of the main program banks). But I agree that nothing beats the simplicity of large linear address spaces. -- - Stephen Fuld (e-mail address disguised to prevent spam)