Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: WiFi enabled cable modems or WiFi routers for Linux? Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 14:50:41 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 35 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 15:50:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7d63717f5f5abd3d4cbca59a027865a8"; logging-data="379107"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+biE0lyCgb96a4S9kawH1bRegBBohN3y0=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WCy9mSJ0hD31Vvidx8o+DKbaMKU= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2435 On 07/07/2024 14:09, Pancho wrote: > On 07/07/2024 13:43, Carlos E. R. wrote: > >> >> Here, they all provide a router with all the features. Well, those >> most demanded, at least. >> > > I would be uncomfortable using an ISP controlled router, allowing the > ISP to control the firewall/gateway into my LAN. > > FWIW, I use pfSense an open source router (FreeBSD based). It offers the > features I need and performance for fast VPN tunnels. I wouldn't like to > change, routing/firewall are both complicated/tricky and boring. It > would be a pain to learn something different. > > For WiFi, I use 4 cheap access points, with fast roaming. I think it > good that this is decoupled from the router, less chance of security > mistake. Also WiFi hardware has improved rapidly, whereas my router > hardware is 10 years old and is still perfectly fine. A very valid approach IMHO I use whatever is lying around for wifi access. The office where the router is, is fully CAT5 enabled so its wifi is never used -- For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is the very definition of slavery. Jonathan Swift