Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:09:03 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <e7e50b27b2f0df2cbd65f7dbafa975f597b8ce78@i2pn2.org> References: <v5vkun$1b0k9$1@dont-email.me> <v60dci$1ib5p$1@dont-email.me> <v60red$1kr1q$2@dont-email.me> <v61hn7$1oec9$1@dont-email.me> <v61ipa$1og2o$2@dont-email.me> <v61jod$1oec9$2@dont-email.me> <v61leu$1p1uo$1@dont-email.me> <dd109397687b2f8e74c3e1e3d826772db8b65e40@i2pn2.org> <v62i31$21b7a$1@dont-email.me> <v632ta$23ohm$2@dont-email.me> <v63jej$26loi$6@dont-email.me> <v63s4h$28goi$2@dont-email.me> <v63s92$28dpi$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:09:03 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2114256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 4157 Lines: 65 Am Wed, 03 Jul 2024 10:55:14 -0500 schrieb olcott: > On 7/3/2024 10:52 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> Op 03.jul.2024 om 15:24 schreef olcott: >>> On 7/3/2024 3:42 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>> Op 03.jul.2024 om 05:55 schreef olcott: >>>>> On 7/2/2024 10:50 PM, joes wrote: >>>>>> Am Tue, 02 Jul 2024 14:46:38 -0500 schrieb olcott: >>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 2:17 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 21:00 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 1:42 PM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 14:22 schreef olcott: >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/2/2024 3:22 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Op 02.jul.2024 om 03:25 schreef olcott: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Every C programmer that knows what an x86 emulator is knows >>>>>>>>>>>>> that when HHH emulates the machine language of >>>>>>>>>>>>> Infinite_Loop, Infinite_Recursion, and DDD that it must >>>>>>>>>>>>> abort these emulations so that itself can terminate >>>>>>>>>>>>> normally. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whether or not it *must* abort is not very relevant. >>>>>>>>>> Repeating the same thing that has already been proved to be >>>>>>>>>> irrelevant does not bring the discussion any further. Sipser is >>>>>>>>>> not relevant, because that is about a correct simulation. >>>>>>>>>> Your simulation is not correct. >>>>>>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated >>>>>>>>> HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> HHH repeats the process twice and aborts too soon. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DDD is correctly emulated by any HHH that can exist which calls >>>>>>> this emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat the process until aborted (which >>>>>>> may be never). >>>>>> Whatever HHH does, it does not run forever but aborts. >>>>>> >>>>> HHH halts on input DDD. >>>>> >>>>> DDD correctly simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt. >>>>> >>>> That would be an error of the simulator, because it aborts its own >>>> simulation too soon, one cycle before the simulated HHH would return >>>> and >>> You dishonestly redefined the problem so that it has no correct >>> answer. >> >> If you think that "What time is a three story building?" must have a >> correct answer, you are wrong. >> Similarly, if you think that HHH can simulate itself correctly, you are >> wrong. >> int H(ptr p, ptr i); >> int main() >> { >> return H(main, 0); >> } >> You showed that H returns, but that the simulation thinks it does not >> return. >> DDD is making it unnecessarily complex, but has the same problem. > main correctly emulated by H never stops running unless aborted. As a matter of fact, H does abort it. It then returns to main, which then stops running. -- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: Objectively I am a genius.