Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Relativity is a pseudoscience II. The Hafele-Keating HOAX, Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 11:37:59 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2517981"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="ovbq/l84ala/wLhXSqScU9GOSIzjukMrxJB27Aq7eyg"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$2.ldCmYoptdp5emF5nND.eEzifG7KC0AWzyZSNxd9obV5oQBlauXu X-Rslight-Posting-User: c1a997029c70f718720f72156b7d7f56416caf7c X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1774 Lines: 15 On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 2:30:18 +0000, rhertz wrote: > http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/HK50/1971-PTTI-Vol-03_17.pdf The above had been written BEFORE their full analysis using the method of correlated rate-change analysis, which I described earlier. So yes, the initial analysis did not look all that great, but the full analysis making use of all of the inter-comparison data was able to resolve the clock glitches. Nowadays, cesium clocks have far greater stability, and convincing results can be obtained using single clocks on short flights and WITHOUT any sophisticated data analysis. http://resource.npl.co.uk/docs/publications/newsletters/metromnia/issue18_einstein.pdf Why do you keep attempting to knock down the H&K experiment?