Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bertel Lund Hansen Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english Subject: Re: OT: Converting miles/km Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:27:27 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <8a49d912-d0bf-3ca1-6f10-2639a7e8eddc@email.de> <875xqpdouq.fsf@parhasard.net> <871q1cdvhm.fsf@parhasard.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 11:27:27 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="44822d900f49f7df0f1708f8812738e5"; logging-data="2279846"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18F3uoAS2TJWFY8fBKbzd8NqoRyUmmn2SXiecWd71fkvQ==" User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:adnXNHR+Q0lMYDB00Ax8VFeK2rs= Bytes: 2254 Aidan Kehoe wrote: > > Should the state force people to have that implant to save a proportion of > > them from illness and premature death? > > The state almost certainly shouldn’t be spending the money to implant this in > everyone, I’d rule it out for that reason. But on pure medical grounds, no, > people have a right to bodily autonomy, it is unethical to make such a thing > mandatory. If a life insurance company were to offer reduced premiums to people > willing to have such a sensor, that would be fine. The comma after "no" is quite important. I missed it in my first reading and got confused when I got to the text after the next comma. My insurance company has given me the option to let them monitor my driving which I accepted. If I drive carefully, the premium will be reduced. I score 8 out of ten with my normal driving. -- Bertel Kolt, Denmark