Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp3-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Most direct violation of inertia in 2 secibd vvideo
From: nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Reply-To: jjlxa31@xs4all.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:00:17 +0200
References: <27fb6050d8f8f1b8c4ac498e912ed69e@www.novabbs.com> <mgv2sk-caje.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <716a5ffff04254cab96f96761a76d893@www.novabbs.com> <tq24sk-r47g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <f13a1b63f886cf79f9e687d826c6add9@www.novabbs.com> <q766sk-77ui.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7aa39eda5f7b6$3971$826957$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <5la6sk-7edj.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7cb350d8e91f4$1$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <e7e8sk-ai5m.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7ec702941291b$1$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <kij8sk-0cdm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f0583a34acfd$2$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <6jp8sk-mikm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f51612b8127f$12$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <18s8sk-t8om.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <17f7f7f5b46186da$2$822353$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <aev8sk-sksm.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <6786f79b6fc42e31eb7e247423acfa09@www.novabbs.com> <5oo9sk-c1tn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <cf5472d9795d3c9ff78902232f8c2760@www.novabbs.com>
Organization: De Ster
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
User-Agent: MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <66f3c310$0$3662$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Sep 2024 10:00:16 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.10.137.58
X-Trace: 1727251216 news-3.free.fr 3662 213.10.137.58:50201
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net
Bytes: 3070

ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <tomyee3@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 3:37:11 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
> 
> > In sci.physics bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
> >> Last of the old guard here in Usenet, Pennino
> >>
> >>
> >> All the other e=mcc thumpers have died off or legged it.
> >
> > Yep, they got tired of the same old insane, babbling nonsense of the
> > mental patients that infected the group.
> 
> Why do you bother responding? In my case, I respond when I feel that
> I have a useful insight or bit of knowledge to share that the sane
> people on these groups might appreciate. For instance, I recently made
> several posts on the topic of correlated rate-change analysis, and I
> estimate that possibly 1-6 sane readers might not already have been
> familiar with the technique. But your posts merely reflect your
> disgust at the narcissistic, egomaniacal delusions held by the
> patients of this mental ward, and provide nothing new for those of
> us looking for new ideas or useful insights.

It is not too different from what 19th century captains did,
logging their chronometers, and making a best guess at Greenwich time
by comparing three of them.
Common sense without sophisticated mathematics also gets you a long way,

Jan