Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.movies.past-films
Subject: Re: When Roger Ebert was mean
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 17:45:32 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <vda7vc$1f2vb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vd50b9$e6bq$1@dont-email.me>
 <0001HW.2CA8ADE101C3F8D930E14538F@news.giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 02:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fbaf6b35f5af653add3416db859e018";
	logging-data="1543147"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bsMsjnHU5G2JICoPVMo/EMusw/RkezEQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jJXMiSfB7CEs7J+Gli6X4kIgbWg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <0001HW.2CA8ADE101C3F8D930E14538F@news.giganews.com>
Bytes: 1694

On 9/28/2024 2:34 PM, Pluted Pup wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:04:41 -0700, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> 
>> 7 of Roger Ebert's Most Brutal Movie Reviews
>> https://time.com/2957019/roger-ebert-life-itself-brutal-reviews/
> 
> North (1994) has some good gags in it, that's better than a lot of
> Ebert's choices.
> 
>

I thought I was the only one who liked North.  I remember them raging 
against it on their show.  Then I saw it and it was OK.  I haven't 
watched it since the original release, but I'd definitely be interested 
in watching it again.