Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dimensional Traveler Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: Whoops! The Atlantic Makes Trump Look EPIC In Cover Intended as a Smear Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:50:31 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: <20240913a@crcomp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 02:50:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="78717c78089cbd4f0050003780f9808b"; logging-data="989531"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nrRVvfZZQpqVreGxxXlD4" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:q04ed/DXz8S3z91Rsg1njnNfmcw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2077 On 9/27/2024 3:55 PM, Mike Van Pelt wrote: > In article , > Chris Buckley wrote: >> I didn't say that unlimited nuclear energy was possible; I only said >> that the Uranium supply was not going to be the limiting factor to the use >> of nuclear energy. There is plenty of Uranium available at managable cost. > > And besides uranium, there's thorium. According to my CRC > handbook in the entry on thorium, it is "about as common as > lead", and "there is probably more available energy in the > Earth's crust from thorium as there is from uranium and all > fossil fuels put together." > > I'd love to see more work done on thorium reactors. > That _sounds_ like an obvious answer to I have to ask what the catch is. -- I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky dirty old man.