Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: William Hyde Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: (ReacTor) Defining Our Terms: What Do We Mean by "Hard SF"? Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 17:07:40 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 23:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c6bf4a9790e77c5b2945d86c461e972d"; logging-data="616995"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18p+w6U78jOzCGSjdTJOTIe" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:2oQhktDFPsOO47h1i1HRzzfFjDE= In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3648 Scott Dorsey wrote: > In article , Titus G wrote: >> Fascinating. >> There was only the one Stage 1 Maths course at the NZ University I >> attended. It was taken by Science, pre-Medical, Arts... all students and >> its main purpose was pure maths in preparation for Stage 2. > > Gatech was the same way. Everybody took a year of engineering calculus and > memorized the 143 required integrals, Memorizing integrals? I can see where it might be useful, but I've never heard of such a requirement. whether they were psychology, physics, > or mechanical engineering. The only people who did not have to take the > engineering calculus classes were management majors (and football players who > had their own special major under the school of management). Even math students > had to take the things (although they also got a math calculus class later). > I think this was a terrible idea but it did help reduce student retention which > was probably the point. > >> I was aware that there were different levels of Statistics at Stage 1, >> for example, the Arts department had their own course for Economics >> students but a pass would not qualify you for entry into Stage 2 >> Statistics in the Science department. > > Okay, statistics is weird... Psych statistics is a crash course in the kind of > statistics needed for experimental design but without any of the theory behind it. > No combinatorial stuff, but lots of correlation and Student's T Test. If you > are lucky you get some applications stuff that explains when particular measures > are useful and when they fail, but this is not always the case. > > Math statistics is all proofs as you would expect. I never took an economics > stats class but I'd be very interested in the curriculum! > >> And having not considered such things for decades, found this thread >> diversion fascinating. > > I am still recovering from my experience. Out here in the real world I have > not solved anything in closed form in ages. Wish someone had taught about > runge-kutta in college (and where the error bounds are). I deeply wish I'd been taught the same. Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg! I spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get RKF4 or RKF8 to deal with my equations some time before continental drift created a new Pangea. William Hyde