Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: Re: (ReacTor) Defining Our Terms: What Do We Mean by "Hard SF"? Date: 22 Aug 2024 23:12:48 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="4936"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 2259 William Hyde wrote: >Scott Dorsey wrote: >> In article , Titus G wrote: >>> Fascinating. >>> There was only the one Stage 1 Maths course at the NZ University I >>> attended. It was taken by Science, pre-Medical, Arts... all students and >>> its main purpose was pure maths in preparation for Stage 2. >> >> Gatech was the same way. Everybody took a year of engineering calculus and >> memorized the 143 required integrals, > >Memorizing integrals? I can see where it might be useful, but I've >never heard of such a requirement. I think memorizing integral tables is kind of a standard thing for engineering calc classes. The whole point of the class is to be able to solve hairy integrals as quickly as possible and there's no time to derive anything that you can memorize. If you try to derive everything you'll never get through a fraction of the exams in time. >> I am still recovering from my experience. Out here in the real world I have >> not solved anything in closed form in ages. Wish someone had taught about >> runge-kutta in college (and where the error bounds are). > >I deeply wish I'd been taught the same. > >Runge-Kutta-Fehlberg! I spent an inordinate amount of time trying to >get RKF4 or RKF8 to deal with my equations some time before continental >drift created a new Pangea. Plot it on graph paper and count the squares... --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."