Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: The joy of FORTRAN
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 07:54:13 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <20241001075413.00004624@gmail.com>
References: <pan$96411$d204da43$cc34bb91$1fe98651@linux.rocks>
	<5mqdnZuGq4lgwm_7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vcub5c$36h63$1@dont-email.me>
	<36KdnVlGJu9VLW77nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<971448126.749088380.092448.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<vd5195$edas$1@dont-email.me>
	<59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad>
	<vd6vto$r0so$1@dont-email.me>
	<iJEJO.198176$kxD8.81657@fx11.iad>
	<3hOdnWpQ649QMGr7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vd8doi$15q07$1@dont-email.me>
	<vd8eg7$15v1j$2@dont-email.me>
	<cxicnVzg_cn_eGX7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<vdapbn$1kp35$5@dont-email.me>
	<xD2dnSerYr-8kmf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<llv25bFa6uvU2@mid.individual.net>
	<n-ednbNVDrThwWf7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<1114392917.749421134.280786.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
	<WHudncjyj7eEHGb7nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 16:54:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f3a1ced4425b80106d0fe41f21b562dc";
	logging-data="2917782"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18/o5NKCutAeKNs9b6hAdqQNaO2dPF29kY="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dXcTWxcfujtaSzetiKxlEQPitC8=
X-Newsreader: Claws Mail 4.2.0 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-w64-mingw32)
Bytes: 2723

On Tue, 1 Oct 2024 00:56:56 -0400
"186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> wrote:

> "AI" might come to the rescue here ... systems tuned to properly
> understand old code (and their original hardware) and re-write in
> something newer (if not greater).

"AI" (by the current definition of "a probabilistic word-salad
generator we're all pretending is 'intelligent,'" anyway) will never
understand this stuff better than even an incompetent human, because
"AI" doesn't *understand* anything at all. If COBOL programs were
*literally* nothing but the empty boilerplate they appear to be, "AI"
might be useful in maintaining them, but if we assume that they
actually do serve a meaningful function, it will be just as useless as
it is at everything else.

If we want a verbose know-nothing capable of being confidently wrong,
we've already *got* humans. And management.