Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: kids these days Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2024 19:53:49 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: <7bglfjtll1os4g6pfqhf1i7jl0acmrvlqv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2024 04:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aa46a8725e0df1c31bac752603293f78"; logging-data="3775783"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WbKMVnzn1/JAJydcDKWCT" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:0rXzDQFdjpBZjyqanfq9kAKYeq0= Bytes: 2431 On Wed, 2 Oct 2024 16:45:37 +0100, Clive Arthur wrote: >On 30/09/2024 19:11, john larkin wrote: > >> >> If they get the DC part about right, I ask them for any other >> comments. All sorts of things could be mentioned. >> >> With the base looking at 5K, it's unlikley to oscillate. It would be a >> miracle if any kid even mentioned emitter follower oscillation. Or >> noise, or tempcos, or anything else. >> > >Along with a colleague, I interviewed someone for a repair technician's >job a few years back. Among the questions was a simple common emitter >single transistor stage which we asked him to explain. > >He blew us away. He knew *far* more detail than either of us. Turned >out he was a shit-hot analog designer looking for a less stressful job >as he wound down to retirement. He turned out to be brilliant at his >new job, and mentored a lot of younger people. He left when the company >was bought by a large US corporation with the concomitant mind-numbing >treacle-wading bullshit. [Me too!] I see the trend, good circuit designers retiring and not being replaced.