Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer? Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2024 23:34:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <21028ed32d20f0eea9a754fafdb64e45@www.novabbs.org> <20240918190027.00003e4e@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:34:41 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f08cca55e0d941314925e901504a6690"; logging-data="1874243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5MnNZXxeVsQFWpzJHZGyM" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:L3PhpVEhBFbglOLF0YQdReWSM30= Bytes: 1835 On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 13:29:31 -0700, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > CPU's that are hyper close to the memory is good wrt locality. However, > the programming for it might turn some programmers off. NUMA like for > sure. I’m pretty sure those multi-million-node Linux supers that fill the top of the Top500 list have a NUMA-style memory-addressing model.