Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,alt.privacy Subject: Re: Apple accused of underreporting suspected CSAM on its platforms Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:42:00 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:42:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3eb9958d5eea0c84948681d44f52d8dc"; logging-data="625773"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+vXWPnMrgO3n5veOTHled8zByolIq0g6I=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:bUgPSnABOR9Oqx6OBuj8VzUEMKQ= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: Bytes: 3118 On 2024-07-29 04:23, Andrew wrote: > Chris wrote on Mon, 29 Jul 2024 06:50:53 -0000 (UTC) : > >>> You not comprehending the difference between zero percent of Apple reports >>> versus zero total convictions is how I know you zealots own subnormal IQs. >> >> Not at all. My position hasn't changed. You, however, have had about three >> different positions on this thread and keep getting confused which one >> you're arguing for. lol. > > Au contraire > > Because I only think logically, my rather sensible position has never > changed, Chris, and the fact you "think" it has changed is simply that you > don't know the difference between the percentage of convictions based on > the number of reports, and the total number of convictions. > > When you figure out that those two things are different, then (and only > then) will you realize I've maintained the same position throughout. > > Specifically.... > > a. If the Apple reporting rate is low, and yet if their conviction > rate is high (based on the number of reports), then they are NOT > underreporting images. Apple's reporting rate is ZERO, because they're not doing scanning of images of any kind.