Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer? Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:40:33 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <2024Sep18.074007@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <2024Sep18.220953@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 23:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e114a577b81d0eff5431452080854aaa"; logging-data="1331451"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181EuqLvXrrLPl6OeuMjgn9" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Wb3VUn6Y1QApVOZ1z42ILRhNUbo= Bytes: 1681 On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:08:23 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote: > If you can back up that claim (that noise in quantum computing comes > from "many worlds") ... No, I’m saying the opposite: the noise comes from the fact that “many worlds” is nonsense.