Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Is Intel exceptionally unsuccessful as an architecture designer? Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:46:40 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <2935676af968e40e7cad204d40cafdcf@www.novabbs.org> <21028ed32d20f0eea9a754fafdb64e45@www.novabbs.org> <20240918190027.00003e4e@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43fa132f54fd9f5c91573130fd9389bf"; logging-data="3066240"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DLiJ6n99LaXA4XUyrSHWY" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:WhrCTZcqJlOX9WGE3Jmn/iuZWRU= Bytes: 1961 On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:30:49 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Chris M. Thomasson [2024-09-20 14:54:36] wrote: >> >> I had this crazy idea of putting cpus right on the ram. So, if you add >> more memory to your system you automatically get more cpu's... Think >> NUMA for a moment... ;^) > > To which Lawrence D'Oliveiro preemptively replied: >> Yes, but that’s a lot more expensive. No I didn’t. My reply said “not so crazy”.