Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 02:09:29 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 19 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 04:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f08cca55e0d941314925e901504a6690"; logging-data="2085842"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+JDK4iUWeBLtns/dmPuJeP" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8E9UG8ft0t9GHpfd6uYfsF02HNY= Bytes: 1933 On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:24:05 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote: > On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 0:14:49 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > >> On 9/21/2024 4:29 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 22:14:12 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote: >>> >>>> But you are in general right, it makes more sense to keep the >>>> computer running in the normal case and provide slow ways to recover >>>> from failures and do something else. >>> >>> Aren’t branches that are not taken supposed to be fast? >> >> Well, they are not taken, so they should be faster... ;^) > > It is NOT the speed, it is the code bloat. That’s an argument against RISC though, isn’t it?