Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Oh my God! Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 23:17:30 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <8440f8224194e3bcea6303bc18cf06a5@www.novabbs.com> References: <17f88836898d852e$12775$844270$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="3495472"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$RU4GzfsKta39NJhpHEettuGRXA4j3n3K4DtLHeAKvXgh59DPvisiq X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 Bytes: 1800 Lines: 15 On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 16:03:45 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: > > W dniu 25.09.2024 o 17:34, gharnagel pisze: > > > > Actually, it might be correct.  Contrary to what Hachel wrote, there > > is no "gap."  The presumption in the figure is that the velocities > > going and returning are constant with an infinite deceleration at > > the turning point.  Realistically, the deceleration would be finite. > > Consequently, the simultaneous line would move smoothly from the > > point intersecting the vertical line and the upper blue line to a > > horizontal line between the turning point and the vertical line > > Consequently - The Shit of your idiot guru > provides no consistent concept of simultaneity. A lie, perpetrated by Wozniak the coprophiliac.