Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: WM and end segments... Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 00:13:38 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <878qxu72zh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <87ed7m7349.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 01:13:38 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2d8b7f9aebd53ab53986b5c5490dbfbf"; logging-data="313244"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+PM8E1CtTQBAsLBJ815dq4aG3+sT5Eqns=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:jdQ88RbyIjPjVku9eE8cjIhW3NE= sha1:3xuWtgdnxcg+WZ/WHlZu/gjeBOc= X-BSB-Auth: 1.57ab24b1945bde902509.20240722001338BST.878qxu72zh.fsf@bsb.me.uk Bytes: 2770 Ben Bacarisse writes: > "Chris M. Thomasson" writes: > >> For some damn reason when I hear end segments from WM I think of a >> tree. Take the following infinite 2-ary tree that holds the positive >> integers: >> ___________________________________________ >> 0 >> / \ >> / \ >> / \ >> / \ >> 1 2 >> / \ / \ >> / \ / \ >> 3 4 5 6 >> / \ / \ / \ / \ >> ......................... >> ___________________________________________ >> >> this goes on and on for infinity... We all can see how this can go for >> infinity, right WM? Wrt trees there are only leaves in a finite view of >> it. However, the "infinite view" of the tree has no leafs because it never >> ends... Fair enough? Or too out there? > > That's a can of worms in WMaths. WM has written 734,342,120 nonsense > posts about binary trees over the years. It's one of his favourite > examples to use to bamboozle his poor students. > > The infinite binary tree -- simply a graph with node set N and edge set > (n, 2n+2) (in your numbering) -- is a particular puzzle for WM because Correction, there are two such edges of course: (n, 2n+1) and (n, 2n+2). > the node and edge sets are countable but the path set isn't. > > Can you see a proof that the infinite rooted paths can be mapped, one to > one, with an uncountable subset of R? > >> ... The infinite one has no leaves. > > If you consider graphs in general, they do not have to be infinite to > have no leaves. -- Ben.