Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: is Vax addressing sane today Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 00:37:25 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <2024Sep10.094353@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <3b7a257101d09e1995314aadace0e14f@www.novabbs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:37:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="43fa132f54fd9f5c91573130fd9389bf"; logging-data="3066240"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C133x0fEG1cO8Tte55nFA" User-Agent: Pan/0.160 (Toresk; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EimNqcszlt2NVswj1UlVXSrnliM= Bytes: 1594 On Mon, 23 Sep 2024 22:17:02 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote: > You argue that trap-on-overflow as an instruction is unnecessary > AND > You argue that overflow detection is worthwhile > AND > You argue that ALU should not raise overflow exceptions > > I am at a loss for how to take all 3 arguments together at the same time > !?! Can you explain ?? The answer is pretty obvious: explicit instruction to branch on overflow detection.