Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: except what, is Vax addressing sane today Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 01:24:05 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2946286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$5DLZa9BPAx59Nr71Urk1BOPoIL0EYNFjR1842E5KwQv6udGlm2vsC X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1664 Lines: 13 On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 0:14:49 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 9/21/2024 4:29 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Sep 2024 22:14:12 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote: >> >>> But you are in general right, it makes more sense to keep the computer >>> running in the normal case and provide slow ways to recover from >>> failures and do something else. >> >> Aren’t branches that are not taken supposed to be fast? > > Well, they are not taken, so they should be faster... ;^) It is NOT the speed, it is the code bloat.