Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 19:45:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 02:45:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b67ec24a85de95a55e6b4d0cc81926c3"; logging-data="3267097"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+LBj8gVQr31bdrzKA8XrXQ" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:s12lIgWbLM/nPpm+JbMjA9Q9HMc= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4225 On 5/25/2024 6:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 5/25/24 7:23 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 5/25/2024 6:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 5/25/24 7:11 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 5/25/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 5/25/24 6:53 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS* >>>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS* >>>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS* >>>>> >>>>> No we need to handle them to know what you have defined. >>>>> >>>>> After all, if we don't agree on the inmplications, we don't have >>>>> agreement on what is being stipuated as the defintions. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent* >>>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent* >>>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent* >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They are not "Baseless" but based on the actual definitions of the >>>>> terms that you are changing. >>>>> >>>> >>>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false* >>>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false* >>>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false* >>> >>> Didn't say that, which shows you to be a liar, or at least being >>> deceptive, which is why we need to handle the implications first >>> >>> (Note, you are just proving that you don't understand how logic works) >>> >>> >>> The implications of your specifications are: >>> >>> 1) That your H is NOT a computation equivalent for a Turing machine. >>> >> >> OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST > > Nope, necessary condition to talk, about the subject line. > I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE. I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE. I CAN PROVE MY POINT IN FIVE STEPS YOU CANNOT SKIP STEP ONE STEP TWO DEPENDS ON STEP ONE, LIKEWISE DOWN TO STEP FIVE. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer