Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach its, own line 06 Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 15:20:26 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 73 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 22:20:26 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="010db72b80f31f696ef17c51994f71bb"; logging-data="3188609"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mr2G3SUqTGgTJFBVyQLI1" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:wm4+xQnQFf5aRnzF1zFOjXbk6RU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 4279 On 5/25/2024 3:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 5/25/24 3:55 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 5/25/2024 2:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 5/25/24 2:27 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> As soon as you first hit the strawman deception change-the-subject >>>> fake rebuttal I pint this pout and erase everything else that you say. >>>> >>>> *Thread renamed to be 100% precisely accurate* >>>> Any divergence from the subject of the thread gets boilerplate reply. >>>> >>> >>> In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, >>> admitting that you plan to change them. >>> >> >> >> http://al.howardknight.net/ >> >> Not at all. I simply utterly reject the dishonest dodge >> of the strawman deception change-the-subject rebuttal. >> >> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C >> 00       int H(ptr p, ptr i); >> 01       int D(ptr p) >> 02       { >> 03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p); >> 04         if (Halt_Status) >> 05           HERE: goto HERE; >> 06         return Halt_Status; >> 07       } >> 08 >> 09       int main() >> 10       { >> 11         H(D,D); >> 12         return 0; >> 13       } >> >> The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is >> correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many >> reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair >> was being referred to. >> >> *Correct Simulation Defined* >>     This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of >>     correct simulation that diverges from this notion. >> >>     A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates at least one >>     of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86 >>     instructions of D. >> >>     This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the >>     order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in >>     recursive simulation. >> >> *Execution Trace* >> Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D); H(D,D) simulates lines 01, 02, and 03 of >> D. This invokes H(D,D) again to repeat the process in endless recursive >> simulation. >> >> > In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, > admitting that you plan to change them. > Not at all and you cannot show that I disagree with the above words to the slightest trace of any degree what-so-ever. *Liar Liar Pants on fire? Will assume so until proven otherwise* -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer