Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:46:24 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v6jig0$1ctoi$11@dont-email.me>
References: <v6e7va$c4sv$1@dont-email.me> <v6g444$pdc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6go4d$sg7f$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikv5$19h6q$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6jguf$1ctoi$5@dont-email.me> <v6ji1d$1dpoc$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 16:46:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b5da22ad5ca0d0ccd5a9478202582a44";
	logging-data="1472274"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/vQ3RpoLrUgNKHqQ9RulIg"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gEXmZG6igpxbHh7iy3UAs3cEIG0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v6ji1d$1dpoc$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3306

On 7/9/2024 9:38 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 09.jul.2024 om 16:19 schreef olcott:
>> On 7/9/2024 1:22 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-08 13:04:13 +0000, olcott said:
>>>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>>>      If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D
>>>>      until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never
>>>>      stop running unless aborted then
>>>>
>>>>      H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D
>>>>      specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations.
>>>> </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022>
>>>>
>>>>> Whether a partial simulation of DDD simulates the return depends
>>>>> on the simulator.
>>>>
>>>> That is false proving that you have insufficient knowledge.
>>>
>>> It is true. There are partial simulators that do simulate D(I) to its 
>>> termination (if it terminates) and there are simulators that don't.
>>> That you cannot imagine something does not mean it can't exist.
>>>
>>
>> No pure function x86 emulator HHH can possibly emulate DDD
>> to its termination.
> 
> Indeed, no such HHH exists. This proves that HHH cannot possibly 
> simulate itself correctly.

"Correctly" means must do whatever the x86 code specifies.
You are in psychological denial causing you to be irrational.

>>
>> _DDD()
>> [00002163] 55         push ebp      ; housekeeping
>> [00002164] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; housekeeping
>> [00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD
>> [0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD)
>> [00002170] 83c404     add esp,+04
>> [00002173] 5d         pop ebp
>> [00002174] c3         ret
>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174]
>>
>> *When DDD is correctly emulated by any pure function*
>> *HHH x86 emulator that can possibly exist* which calls
>> an emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat this process until the
>> emulated DDD is aborted.
> 


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer