Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connectionsPath: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Flat out dishonest or totally ignorant? --- Richard seems to be willfully ignorant Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 21:03:11 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <7b6a00827bfcc84e99e19a0d0ae6028ebcdc263c@i2pn2.org> <178edf6a7c5329df35a9af6852ecbd41c0948ea1@i2pn2.org> <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 04:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="29a678b7ecb7074967021c8dcb9f1179"; logging-data="1972322"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BPa/s9Qo0RQX2pSwYI74t" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:CW53orfg8pJUTG50t71uDRlB1Ho= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <168858894febbaa529d1704ea864bbe15cb8f635@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 3453 On 7/2/2024 8:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 7/2/24 9:32 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 7/2/2024 8:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 7/2/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote: >>> >>>> Professor Sipser probably does understand the x86 language. >>>> Shared-memory implementation of the Karp-Sipser >>>> kernelization process >>>> https://inria.hal.science/hal-03404798/file/hipc2021.pdf >>>> >>>> >>> And the x86 language says the same thing, >>> >>> YOU are just a liar, as proved by the fact that you can not give the >>> Diagonalization proof you claimed you had. >>> >>> Sorry, you are just too stupid to understand. >> >> You continue to assume that you can simply disagree >> with the x86 language. My memory was refreshed that >> called you stupid would be a sin according to Christ. >> I really want to do the best I can to repent. >> > > But I am NOT disagreeing with the x86 language. > > Can you point out what fact of it I am disagreing about it? > You keep trying to get away with saying that the simulation is incorrect when the semantics of the x86 language conclusively proves that it is correct. _DDD() [00002172] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002173] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002175] 6872210000 push 00002172 ; push DDD [0000217a] e853f4ffff call 000015d2 ; call HHH(DDD) [0000217f] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002182] 5d pop ebp [00002183] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002183] DDD is correctly emulated by HHH which calls an emulated HHH(DDD) to repeat this process until the emulated DDD is aborted. At no point in this emulation does the call from DDD correctly emulated by HHH to HHH(DDD) ever return. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer