Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2 ---woefully mistaken rebuttal
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:02:37 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <v7tltt$296ug$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
 <8a6e6d9ff49aabe2525ce5729a439c807de4768a@i2pn2.org>
 <34Ocnd4voeWlDAn7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v725d7$hlvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <aa7643b6d8c46d2c4dd5ef92ae3650afe114adbb@i2pn2.org>
 <v734ct$mjis$2@dont-email.me>
 <056325e336f81a50f4fb9e60f90934eaac823d22@i2pn2.org>
 <v73gk2$obtd$1@dont-email.me>
 <e2958e7ea04d53590c79b53bfb4bc9dff468772b@i2pn2.org>
 <v742r2$s48s$2@dont-email.me>
 <210383b2ee318f68a96d94aec314ee8b93f79b7f@i2pn2.org>
 <v75u22$19j7l$4@dont-email.me>
 <fde630817c49562bc765bdbc98e16a1582bcad53@i2pn2.org>
 <v78mda$1smtm$2@dont-email.me> <v7d5cl$2t3ja$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7ds0o$30pvh$3@dont-email.me> <v7fs29$3f4g7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7gd17$3hlc2$2@dont-email.me> <v7ikn4$1jv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7j2pg$3o7r$3@dont-email.me> <v7l3di$idv1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7lnrf$luh0$1@dont-email.me> <v7niqp$13ghd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v7obbn$17h8r$1@dont-email.me>
 <2eecnR6fa9XiWzz7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v7tlin$2acgd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:02:38 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="015a45108446ce6e0f392535ed7af55b";
	logging-data="2399184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/6tl9PgXy0o00bAR43u6b"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:cIfzOAcqVe6BWndarqr05h8w6NE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v7tlin$2acgd$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2460

Le 25/07/2024 à 15:56, olcott a écrit :
....
> If you care study the code that I just provided
> (and don't just ignore this and assume that I must be wrong)
> you can see that when DDD is correctly emulated by HHH that
> DDD does correctly have different behavior than DDD correctly
> emulated by HHH1.

The same code emulated "correctly" twice with different behavior???

You are definitely insane, Robert.