Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly halt --- templates and infinite sets Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:36:16 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 04:36:17 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a722b73a14c6c7bef786c05822a9348"; logging-data="1601124"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+EEJzqVBmSq10FDfGcKrNp" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:sYhWYEIxHkpzQZtDMQcEpK4Kzp8= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Bytes: 2380 On 5/29/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 5/29/24 9:55 PM, olcott wrote: >> When the category is examined all at once then there is no need >> to look at each individual element. > > So, which one or ones gave the correct answer for their input? > *Formalizing the Linz Proof structure* ∃H ∈ Turing_Machines ∀x ∈ *Turing_Machines_Descriptions* ∀y ∈ Finite_Strings such that H(x,y) = Halts(x,y) When we formalize it that way then some simulating halt deciders get the correct answer. *Everyone else implicitly assumes this incorrect formalization* ∃H ∈ Turing_Machines ∀x ∈ *Turing_Machines* ∀y ∈ Finite_Strings such that H(x,y) = Halts(x,y) -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer