Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: WM and end segments... Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 13:02:38 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: <87ed7m7349.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0QcM9G1omJ2PKIjSNt0DAeubbXs@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:02:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0307fbf971d8559d1911245420400168"; logging-data="1419940"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19+efPmFeEubZKTKdhvR6/lhQX4JogJNHA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:PFnM6SWXYP3Aa0VJT8KrHXgI4ug= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1928 On 7/22/2024 2:04 PM, Moebius wrote: > Am 22.07.2024 um 22:47 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > >>> It is impossible to use infinite sequences of Ls or Rs. [...] > > @WM: No, you fucking asshole full of shit. Yup! A song for WM. DUH, DDDUUUUH, DUUH, DADUUUHH, ect...: https://youtu.be/32ZTjFW2RYo?list=RDGMEMQ1dJ7wXfLlqCjwV0xfSNbA lol. > > We may DEFINE, say, the infinite sequence A = (a_n)_(n e IN) with a_n = > L for all n e IN. > > Then it's possible (at least in math) to "use" this sequence (by > referring to it in mathematical arguments). > > > Your mind cannot fathom infinity of any kind. > > Agree.