Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase? Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:04:58 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: References: <7kWvquYAIwnpmJER42BML2v7650@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:04:58 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1711641"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 1717 Lines: 15 Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 15:03:10 +0000 schrieb WM: > Le 30/06/2024 à 12:02, FromTheRafters a écrit : >> WM pretended : > >>> The set of natural indices is a set. >>> Shifting it to the left shifts every index and every indexed nine to >>> the left. >> That still doesn't affect the fact that aleph_null is not a real >> number. > But the set of indices is invariable. It cannot even expand by one > index. Which it doesn’t. There is no end to it. -- Am Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:52:17 -0500 schrieb olcott: Objectively I am a genius.