Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No evidence
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:28:54 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4144a4a378a851665e4e8cf08dd46467@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:28:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13667f7f784b12ddf646b0c4bb2cfab5";
	logging-data="1482403"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18QvxokQ5cqXzSjOU8FIw3R"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XW4bNx5EQOh9TyoYtdK4/qUxqX8=
Bytes: 1411

On 2024-09-13 17:50:59 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:

> Perhaps that goes for the relativistic formula for the effects of
> gravity on atomic clocks.

The relativistic formula for the effects of gravity on atomic clocks
has been verified for weak fields.

> What does electromagnetism have to do with the
> decay rate of atomic clocks?

The frequency of atomic clocks is not a decay rate. Atomic clocks
are shielded against effects of electormagnetism. Similar shielding
against gravity is not possible.

-- 
Mikko