Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:11:21 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <0b2ff7832787b9d3165d93803b09df8f@www.novabbs.com> <74ipUL6JcQu72w-mbGQ7BbVp7kU@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com> <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com> <17ea67a48e5596d2$254537$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <17ea6ba7b9983909$254540$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 40 Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.neodome.net!feeder2.feed.ams11.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 17:11:21 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 2650 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17ea6d34e26eaaba$275903$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3010 W dniu 10.08.2024 o 18:56, gharnagel pisze: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:42:55 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >> >> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 18:27, gharnagel pisze: >> > >> > Yep, I often give him the benefit of the doubt and give him either >> > option.  It's a conundrum to determine which one is worse.  If he's >> > a liar AND God exists, then he goes to hell.  So it's better to be >> > stupid.  OTOH, if God doesn't exist, it's worse to be stupid. >> >> It's amusing that such a piece of lying >> shit is believing  God, you know. > > Wozzie is projecting again :-)) > >> Sure, Harrie, your lies won't be punished cause >> you're lying for a just cause. > > No such thing.  Wozzie is projecting again, believing > HIS lies are in a "just" cause. > >> How about your lie of GPS clocks readings? >> When reading of the one from Earth will be >> 2024-08-31 17:00:00,000000000-  what will >> be the reading of the one from the >> satellite? Numbers, please. >> >> Still no answer, Harrie? Of course. > > I answered, but Walnut-brain Wozzie is too stupid > to understand.  He's dissembling again, asking what > the reading FROM the satellite is, not the reading > AT the satellite. Harrie, poor lying trash, you're an idiot, sure, but even such an idiot should notice that what you wrote is not any number - and what I asked you was a number.