Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:05:26 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Energy? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <66A8307B.8B6@ix.netcom.com> <9U6dneBCi4_A_DX7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <66A9CBC9.2213@ix.netcom.com> <66a9ef78$1$8237$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <17e73ef78c331cc1$123024$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <7c859ee125873c07a6e93c2ff0fa5099@www.novabbs.com> <17e766fee8072224$32990$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <7d6a2d9468448e1cf6ca34ac933b4f40@www.novabbs.com> <66ac9361$1$11712$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: <66ac9361$1$11712$426a34cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 60 Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 09:05:24 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 3055 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e7de0bc2d3d88a$145587$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 3462 W dniu 02.08.2024 o 10:05, J. J. Lodder pisze: > gharnagel wrote: > >> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 20:43:47 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>> >>> W dniu 31.07.2024 o 17:30, gharnagel pisze: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 8:30:15 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote: >>>>> >>>>> And thus - conservation of energy, your alleged >>>>> "law of nature" is really a simple language truism >>>>> (and it's not a critique, just stating the fact). >>>> >>>> So Wozzie doesn't believe energy conservation is a >>>> law? >>> >>> Herrie, poor halfbrain, you're free to >>> believe The Nature herself speaking to Chosen >>> Ones and reveal Her Laws for repeating to >>> little ones; but only idiots like you >>> can believe such crap. >> >> So eighth-brain Wozzie, by his own admission, >> doesn't believe in conservation of energy. >> Why would that be? Perhaps it's because he >> doesn't believe in anything? >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism >> >>> With the definition above - your "law" is >>> a simple truism, and some fanatic idiots >>> screaming "NOOOOOO!!!!" change nothing. >> >> Wozzie-idiot, the disinformation engineer, >> doesn't understand science. Of COURSE >> conservation of energy is falsifiable! It >> can be determined by making measurements. >> So far, it hasn't been falsified. Supposed >> problems have arisen in the past and were >> put to rest by finding new forms of energy >> or new particles. > > So it is not falsifiable by experiments. > It can only be falsified -by failure- > to find a new and better theory > of what energy is. (in which it is again conserved) > > Of course such a situation is impossible, > for such a failure to find a better thery > could just be due to our collective stupidity. > We can never be sure that it cannot exist, Even a relativistic idiots can (partially) think sometimes. That's right. Your alleged "Law of Nature" allegedly revealed to you by Nature Herself - is really a simple language truism. You really have no clue of what science is doing to you and what it is using you for.