Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 13:39:02 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Does Lobachevsky's V axiom deny Euclid's V axiom Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <17e9a9478a391c46$205292$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: pl From: Maciej Wozniak In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 31 Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2024 11:39:01 +0000 X-Received-Bytes: 1753 Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com Message-Id: <17e9bde92a2c1067$206445$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> Bytes: 2175 W dniu 08.08.2024 o 12:05, Python pisze: > Le 08/08/2024 à 07:20, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> >> Well, they're practically  negation of each other. >> And you won't find a rule "not p is not necessarily >> denying p" in mathematics - but it is an usual component >> of pseudophilosophies concocted by morons for excusing >> both their inconsistencies and plain lies. >> >> So - the question is as in the topic. What do you think? > > https://www.cartoonstock.com/cartoon?searchID=CS198505 > > "Just a darn minute — Yesterday you said that X equals two!" Keep raving and spitting, poor stinker. You won't find a rule "not p is not necessarily denying p" in mathematics - but it is an usual component of pseudophilosophies concocted by morons for excusing both their inconsistencies and plain lies. Not only your bunch of idiots denied basic math, but it also fabricated the evidence against basic math. And whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid would be, and he has written it clearly enough for anyone able to read (even if not clearly enough for you, poor stinker).